FAAA raises CSLR concerns with Minister Jones
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94aa9/94aa939b1f6f53d361e8d6b5b4a4ce520e93406a" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94aa9/94aa939b1f6f53d361e8d6b5b4a4ce520e93406a" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cd68/3cd68a3be365193c55d7e1256d811fa4df6e9d98" alt="image"
The Financial Advice Association Australia (FAAA) has met with Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, to discuss their concerns about the escalating costs of the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR).
The organisation met with Jones on 14 August to discuss the total cost of the scheme and its operation.
The CSLR was launched in April and is actively managing 102 claims at the moment, 79 per cent of which are related to financial advice. It has paid a total of 37 claims since its introduction, representing $3.3 million so far, and 20 claims have been closed due to ineligibility.
Thanks to complaints about Dixon Advisory to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, which stand at more than 2,700, the majority of CSLR claims and levy fall on the financial advice sector. As a result, the CSLR levy for the financial advice sector stands at $18.5 million out of a total levy of $24.1 million.
FAAA chief executive Sarah Abood said: “We have told the minister that although we support the scheme, the funding model is completely unsustainable.
“The financial advice profession does not have the capacity to pay compensation to the clients of large listed entities which have done the wrong thing, and nor should we. We are looking at losses approaching $135 million for Dixon Advisory alone, with nothing in place to stop similar situations happening in the future.”
She said she felt that Jones had “clearly heard these concerns” and intended to work with the body and Treasury to ensure the CSLR could successfully achieve its goals.
“He has advised us that the FAAA will have the opportunity to work with Treasury to outline unintended consequences of the CSLR and listen to pragmatic and feasible solutions.”
Abood also referenced the public inquiry that her colleague, Phil Anderson, called for into what happened at Dixon Advisory, where the majority of CSLR complaints were centered.
This inquiry would consider the Dixon Advisory judgment, the original action and what changed, the decision by ASIC to settle, what the judgment said and the Dixon Advisory class action.
“With potential losses approaching $400 million, there is a clear public interest in understanding what has happened and how similar situations can be prevented in future,” Abood said.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
...ummmm, I thought Managed Investment Schemes were excluded from the CSLR??? ...but Jones is including the Dixon Advisory MIS exclusively...(and retrospectively)! How odd? Apparently a lot of Canberra based government bureaucrats lost money in the scam! Makes sense now..!