‘Extend anti-hawking laws to advisers’ cold calls’: AIST

AIST super fund financial advice regulation

2 February 2023
| By Rhea Nath |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has advocated for banning unsolicited calls to consumers from advisers and financial planning businesses in an extension of existing anti-hawking legislation.

Though superannuation products were subject to the laws, per recommendations by the Hayne Royal Commission, it did not extend to financial services like advice, AIST chief executive Eva Scheerlinck argued, adding that a number of firms used intermediaries to solicit business through these means.

She outlined cases where super fund members would receive cold calls from an intermediary generating business for a financial planner, cautioning them about their current “high risk” fund. The member would then receive documents over email, like a completed application for a retail fund and an invoice for advice that was not provided, to be signed. 

It resulted in consumers rolling over from high-performing, low fee profit-to-member funds to poorer-performing retail funds, shelling out up to $6,000 in adviser fees in the process.

“A number of these cases have been reported to [the Australian Securities and Investments Commission] and while ASIC may be able to pursue the advisers for poor advice, this is a time-consuming ‘whack a mole’ approach that does not address the systemic risk to customers,” Scheerlinck elaborated.

In a pre-Budget submission to Government, she noted “the same imbalance of power exists in the unsolicited sale of financial services as in the unsolicited sale of financial products”.

“We all know the feeling of receiving an unsolicited call from a number we don’t recognise and speaking to somebody we don’t know who is trying to sell us something we don’t need or even want,” she stated.

“When they’re selling financial services like super advice to skirt around a gap in the law and trying to bamboozle consumers with half-truths into signing up for a costly service that is not in their financial interests, it should be outlawed.”

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Realistic on Thu, 2023-02-02 09:38

FUM - follow the money. "It resulted in consumers rolling over from high-performing, low fee profit-to-member funds to poorer-performing retail funds, shelling out up to $6,000 in adviser fees in the process."
Is why we have all the red tape - and product providers don't? Seems these low fee profit-to-member funds have benefited from the elimination of the Banks/AMP and are looking set to benefit from Michelle Levy's recommendations.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

3 days 23 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 2 days ago

increased professionalism within the industry - shouldn't that say, FAR register almost halving in the last 24 months he...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 3 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

2 days 22 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

2 days 1 hour ago