Exclude advice from product intervention, says FPA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b5b3/5b5b3c1389437f4c5f1626ed3922e690bc689e93" alt="draft legislation image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b5b3/5b5b3c1389437f4c5f1626ed3922e690bc689e93" alt="draft legislation image"
The Federal Treasury has acted correctly in excluding financial advice from the legislation delivering the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) product intervention powers, according to the Financial Planning Association (FPA).
In a submission filed with the Treasury this week, the FPA has congratulated the Treasury for providing an exclusion for financial advice within the legislation exposure draft for the Treasury Laws Amendment (Design and Distribution Obligations and Product Intervention Powers) Bill 2018.
The legislation is intended to give ASIC greater powers with respect to product design and intervention, and the financial planning industry has been keen to ensure that the delivery of financial advice did not become entangled in the processes.
The FPA said that personal advice was already sufficiently regulated and did not need to be caught up in the proposed new arrangements.
“As we have stated previously, personal advice is already regulated to ensure the adviser acts in the best interests of the particular client,” the submission said. “There is no benefit, and potentially a detriment, in also applying the design and distribution obligations to personal advice.”
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.