Evidence presentation method crucial to AAT's findings
How investors present evidence to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) and how they explain them is critical to how the AAT looks at a case, according to SMH Lawyers partner David Hughes.
Addressing the SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia conference, Hughes quoted a case in which an investor's superannuation payment was delayed in a superannuation clearing house and made its way into the investor super fund at a later date, thereby being subject to a extremely high tax assessment.
If the evidence provided to the AAT had been presented differently, the result of the case may have been different, Hughes said.
Many of the cases that come before the AAT are the result of investors' ignorance, Hughes said.
Investors needed to get advice first, and that was a missing factor in a lot of these AAT cases.
Getting the evidence right without good financial advice and good legal advice was very difficult, he said.
The way evidence is presented is paramount and can win or lose a case with the AAT, Hughes added.
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
