Evidence presentation method crucial to AAT's findings
How investors present evidence to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) and how they explain them is critical to how the AAT looks at a case, according to SMH Lawyers partner David Hughes.
Addressing the SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia conference, Hughes quoted a case in which an investor's superannuation payment was delayed in a superannuation clearing house and made its way into the investor super fund at a later date, thereby being subject to a extremely high tax assessment.
If the evidence provided to the AAT had been presented differently, the result of the case may have been different, Hughes said.
Many of the cases that come before the AAT are the result of investors' ignorance, Hughes said.
Investors needed to get advice first, and that was a missing factor in a lot of these AAT cases.
Getting the evidence right without good financial advice and good legal advice was very difficult, he said.
The way evidence is presented is paramount and can win or lose a case with the AAT, Hughes added.
Recommended for you
The corporate regulator has cancelled the AFSL of a Perth advice firm with the firm having previously seen its licence temporarily suspended in 2020.
Having proposed changes earlier this year, ASIC has clarified how it will support licensees with additional relief under the reportable situations regime.
AMP has partnered with BlackRock and research house Lonsec to provide a model portfolio capability on its North platform that offers “portfolio customisation at scale” to advice practices of all sizes.
Akumin has added a Victorian advice practice to its network, signalling a “focus on recruitment and growth” including by supporting single-adviser practices.
