Evidence presentation method crucial to AAT's findings
How investors present evidence to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) and how they explain them is critical to how the AAT looks at a case, according to SMH Lawyers partner David Hughes.
Addressing the SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia conference, Hughes quoted a case in which an investor's superannuation payment was delayed in a superannuation clearing house and made its way into the investor super fund at a later date, thereby being subject to a extremely high tax assessment.
If the evidence provided to the AAT had been presented differently, the result of the case may have been different, Hughes said.
Many of the cases that come before the AAT are the result of investors' ignorance, Hughes said.
Investors needed to get advice first, and that was a missing factor in a lot of these AAT cases.
Getting the evidence right without good financial advice and good legal advice was very difficult, he said.
The way evidence is presented is paramount and can win or lose a case with the AAT, Hughes added.
Recommended for you
ASIC has cancelled a Sydney AFSL for failing to pay a $64,000 AFCA determination related to inappropriate advice, which then had to be paid by the CSLR.
A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments for investments.
Inefficient data processes and systems mean advisers are spending over half of their time on product implementation and administration at the expense of clients, according to research.
With the regulator announcing its enforcement focus for 2025 last week, law firm Hall & Wilcox examines the areas which have dropped down the list in priority for the regulator.
