Esuperfund pays infringement notices for false/misleading advertising
Esuperfund Pty Ltd has paid $30,600 in penalties after the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) issued three infringement notices in relation to "false or misleading" online advertising.
In a statement released today, ASIC revealed that each of the infringement notices carried a penalty of $10,200.
The offending advertisements related to Esuperfund's business of providing self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) establishment and administration services online to clients. Each advertisement ran between 31 January 2014 and 8 May 2014.
ASIC said it was was concerned that:
- one advertisement inaccurately represented that clients who engaged Esuperfund to establish an SMSF in 2014 would not incur any fees or costs in establishing or operating the SMSF
- an article titled ‘9 Benefits of Setting Up A Self Managed Super Fund' misrepresented the costs and benefits of SMSFs compared to retail and industry superannuation funds, and
- a third advertisement falsely represented that ASIC reviewed Esuperfund's operations annually to ensure that it complied with its licensing obligations.
ASIC Deputy Chairman Peter Kell said, "Setting up an SMSF is an extremely important financial decision and advertisements must accurately reflect the service being offered".
Esuperfund has removed the statements from its website.
The payment of an infringement notice is not an admission of a contravention of the ASIC Act consumer protection provisions. ASIC can issue an infringement notice where it has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened certain consumer protection laws.
AUTHOR
Nicholas O'Donoghue
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
