Enforceable undertaking for Foster Stockbroking
Sydney-based Australian financial services licensee, Foster Stockbroking is providing an enforceable understanding to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) following the regulator’s investigation into conflict of interest concerns at the firm.
ASIC found that Foster Stockbroking, the Sole Lead Manager for an initial public offering (IPO) of Reffind Limited (RFN) in 2015, had engaged in illegal conduct which saw the RFN IPO oversubscribed by at least 385 per cent.
“ASIC considers the process of allocating securities by stockbrokers in capital markets raisings should be efficient, honest and fair, and the publication by those stockbrokers of sell-side research on securities should be independent and objective,” said commissioner Cathie Armour.
“Ensuring this conduct meets these standards directly is necessary to ensure the integrity of financial markets and investor confidence in those markets.”
ASIC found that:
- There has been no effective separation of FSB's research function from its other functions and a research report about RFN was written by the head of investment banking at FSB, who had an ongoing corporate advisory role with RFN;
- Statements contained in the research in relation to its objectivity could have been misleading; and
- At the time of the publication of the report, both the head of investment banking and associates of FSB had significant holdings in RFN that were not adequately disclosed in the research.
The regulator said FEB has undertaken various processes to change its systems and controls to eliminate reoccurrence of the concerns.
AUTHOR
Hope William-Smith
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
