Enforceable undertaking for Foster Stockbroking
Sydney-based Australian financial services licensee, Foster Stockbroking is providing an enforceable understanding to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) following the regulator’s investigation into conflict of interest concerns at the firm.
ASIC found that Foster Stockbroking, the Sole Lead Manager for an initial public offering (IPO) of Reffind Limited (RFN) in 2015, had engaged in illegal conduct which saw the RFN IPO oversubscribed by at least 385 per cent.
“ASIC considers the process of allocating securities by stockbrokers in capital markets raisings should be efficient, honest and fair, and the publication by those stockbrokers of sell-side research on securities should be independent and objective,” said commissioner Cathie Armour.
“Ensuring this conduct meets these standards directly is necessary to ensure the integrity of financial markets and investor confidence in those markets.”
ASIC found that:
- There has been no effective separation of FSB's research function from its other functions and a research report about RFN was written by the head of investment banking at FSB, who had an ongoing corporate advisory role with RFN;
- Statements contained in the research in relation to its objectivity could have been misleading; and
- At the time of the publication of the report, both the head of investment banking and associates of FSB had significant holdings in RFN that were not adequately disclosed in the research.
The regulator said FEB has undertaken various processes to change its systems and controls to eliminate reoccurrence of the concerns.
AUTHOR
Hope William-Smith
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
