End TPB/FASEA duplication says FSC

FASEA Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority TPB Tax Practitioners Board FSC financial services council Sally Loane financial advisers tax financial advisers Royal Commission RC

13 September 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Services Council has called for an end to the duplication which sees tax financial advisers answerable to both the Tax Practitioners Board (TPB) regime and the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA).

In a submission filed with the independent review of the TPB and The Tax Agents Services Act 2009, the FSC pointed to the rapidly-changing nature of the regulatory environment for financial advisers and urged simplification.

Further, it has urged dialogue between the TPB and the FASEA to achieve such an outcome.

FSC chief executive, Sally Loane, said the FSC was recommending a single regulatory regime for advisers who provided both tax and financial advice, replacing the current regime with overlapping and duplicated registration.

“The FSC’s preferred approach would mean advisers adhere to one code of ethics, and are overseen by one code monitoring body that helps deliver the protections consumers expect and that advisers are obliged to adhere to,” Loane said. 

“Ongoing changes to the regulatory environment for financial advisers, including new professional and education standards are transforming financial advisers into a profession in line with other professions such as accounting and law. 

“These changes present a timely opportunity to integrate Tax (Financial) Advisers (TFAs) into the regulatory framework for financial advisers.”

This reform would bring TFAs into a single regulatory regime under FASEA reducing unnecessary costs and bringing greater clarity to consumers and advisers. Advisers would continue to be bound by other regulations including privacy and anti-money laundering laws.

“This reform would not mean a decline in the standards for TFAs – the FSC’s proposal would just remove unnecessary regulatory duplication and overlap. It would also mirror the approach for lawyers who do not need to register with the TPB given their existing strong regulatory structures,” Loane said.

“The FSC’s recommended approach means consumers would not have to engage with the TPB for the tax component of the advice they receive as well as the Code Monitoring Body for financial advice.

“Ensuring a simplified regulatory regime that reduces regulatory overlap and is easier for customers to navigate is thoroughly consistent with the recommendations of the Hayne Royal Commission,” Loane.

The FSC considers the TPB and FASEA should continue to have open dialogue as these new standards are implemented and to develop a single regime for financial advisers. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

1 day 12 hours ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

2 months ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months 1 week ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

3 weeks 4 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

2 weeks 4 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

2 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS