End TPB/FASEA duplication says FSC

13 September 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Services Council has called for an end to the duplication which sees tax financial advisers answerable to both the Tax Practitioners Board (TPB) regime and the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA).

In a submission filed with the independent review of the TPB and The Tax Agents Services Act 2009, the FSC pointed to the rapidly-changing nature of the regulatory environment for financial advisers and urged simplification.

Further, it has urged dialogue between the TPB and the FASEA to achieve such an outcome.

FSC chief executive, Sally Loane, said the FSC was recommending a single regulatory regime for advisers who provided both tax and financial advice, replacing the current regime with overlapping and duplicated registration.

“The FSC’s preferred approach would mean advisers adhere to one code of ethics, and are overseen by one code monitoring body that helps deliver the protections consumers expect and that advisers are obliged to adhere to,” Loane said. 

“Ongoing changes to the regulatory environment for financial advisers, including new professional and education standards are transforming financial advisers into a profession in line with other professions such as accounting and law. 

“These changes present a timely opportunity to integrate Tax (Financial) Advisers (TFAs) into the regulatory framework for financial advisers.”

This reform would bring TFAs into a single regulatory regime under FASEA reducing unnecessary costs and bringing greater clarity to consumers and advisers. Advisers would continue to be bound by other regulations including privacy and anti-money laundering laws.

“This reform would not mean a decline in the standards for TFAs – the FSC’s proposal would just remove unnecessary regulatory duplication and overlap. It would also mirror the approach for lawyers who do not need to register with the TPB given their existing strong regulatory structures,” Loane said.

“The FSC’s recommended approach means consumers would not have to engage with the TPB for the tax component of the advice they receive as well as the Code Monitoring Body for financial advice.

“Ensuring a simplified regulatory regime that reduces regulatory overlap and is easier for customers to navigate is thoroughly consistent with the recommendations of the Hayne Royal Commission,” Loane.

The FSC considers the TPB and FASEA should continue to have open dialogue as these new standards are implemented and to develop a single regime for financial advisers. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

2 months 1 week ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

2 months 1 week ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

2 months 1 week ago

A Sydney-based financial adviser has been banned from providing financial services in the interest of consumer protection after failing to act on conduct concerns. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of a $250 million Sydney fund manager, one of two AFSL cancellations announced by the corporate regulator....

3 weeks 1 day ago

Having divested its advice business in August, AMP is undergoing restructuring in at least four other departments amid a cost simplification program....

2 weeks 5 days ago