An end to planning’s golden age?
The golden age of financial planning business valuations may have peaked with a combination of the Royal Commission, the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) regime and tighter regulation spelling particular trouble for practices reliant on grandfathered commissions and operating under an institutional licensee.
That is the bottom line assessment of leading business brokerage and consultancy firm, Chase Corporate Advisory with executive directors, Greg Quinn and Marcelo Fernandez producing an analysis which squarely points to the sellers’ market of the past five years and average premium valuations of 3.2 to 3.5 times becoming more problematic.
The pair predicted that, in the future, there would be greater polarisation in both the quality of financial planning firms and the valuation multiples those firms ultimately attract. However, they suggested that predictions of up to 57 per cent of advisers departing the industry as being probably excessive.
In doing so, they exampled a mid-sized financial planning firm in a large institutionally-owned AFSL with a Buyer of Last Resort (BOLR) valuation and a material level of trail commissions from super and investment products and the principles approaching retirement age in the next five years.
“Our advice to this type of firm would be to consider their options either under their BOLR arrangement or a contested trade sale as soon as possible,” the analysis said. “These types of firms face the greatest future valuation downside risk as either their existing trail commission will continue to come under scrutiny or will require a significant amount of work to re-engage clients and convert them into on-going fee-paying clients.”
The analysis also pointed to problems for firms with internal product integration (IMA/SMA/MDA or use licensee products) stating there was a real risk that recommendations from the Royal Commission would adversely impact such firms.
“These recommendations and subsequent legislation will most likely require you to engage in some restructuring to enable you to continue with your existing arrangements,” the analysis said. “At the moment the Royal Commission is looking at both vertically and horizontally integrated models with a view to eliminating both the perceived and real conflicts of interests within these models.”
On the upside, the Chase Corporate analysis pointed to a better outlook for mid-to large-sized financial planning businesses with 80 to 90 per cent derived from ongoing advice fees rather than trail commissions with “engaged clients in solid value proposition”.
“We expect that these firms will continue to attract a premium valuation into the future. These are generally firms that have already positioned themselves for the future and are ahead of the competition,” it said.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
