Effectiveness of FPA sanctions to be put to test
The ability of the Financial Planning Association (FPA) to sanction its members will be put under the spotlight when it finally announces what sanctions and penalties will be applied against financial planner, Sam Henderson, who was this week determined to have breached the organisation’s Code of Professional Practice.
While Henderson was found by the FPA’s Conduct Review Commission to have been guilty of eight out of 10 alleged breaches, it has not yet been determined what penalty will be imposed.
The CRC’s official finding said that the panel made “no determinations in respect of costs and out of pocket expenses of the FPA at this stage”.
However, it said it reserved the question whether to make any such determination for further submission and said it was providing “the parties with an opportunity to make submissions as to the imposition of any sanction, in a manner and within the times that are to be advised”.
“Such submissions may also address the costs and expenses of the FPA,” the CRC determination said.
The alleged failures of Henderson dealt with by the CRC were also aired during the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, which heard that Henderson had actually resigned his membership of the FPA.
In circumstances where a planner is no longer a member of the FPA and may no longer be working in the planning industry, questions are being raised about the ability of the organisation to impose sanctions or to recover costs.
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
