Education standards don’t address vertical integration
The recently enacted Corporations Amendment (Professional Standards of Financial Advisers) Act 2017 has ignored the “elephant in the room” – vertical integration and conflicts, according to Assured Support.
The firm’s founder, Sean Graham, has urged financial advisers to look beyond the legislation and address deeper challenges as advice emerges as a profession such as conflicts, capability, and confidence.
“The act does not address the ‘elephant in the room’ – vertical integration and the insidious impact it has on advice quality,” Graham said.
“The act focus on agents, rather than principals, and their focus is deliberate. In fact, their emphasis on professional standards is an implicit acceptance of the ‘bad apples’ theory too often used to normalise cultural failures.”
Graham outlined three risks that could hinder the effectiveness of the Professional Standards Act:
- Time: the short timeframe and the large-scale agenda would drive the Standards Board to make decisions based on the timetable rather than on sufficient consideration and analysis.
- Consultation – the need to consult with the industry on the changes would be overridden by the act’s recognition that lack of consultation would not nullify legislative instruments made by the Standards Body.
- The Standards Body board could be filled with the “usual suspects” with ingrained partisan positions.
Graham further reiterated fears that the act would entrench existing interests rather than improve adviser capability.
“Unfortunately, we may have limited capacity to influence the Standards Body but we do have both the opportunity and obligation to shape the future of continuing professional development,” Graham said.
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
