Economic fundamentals need long-term policy
Global economies and employment levels will not improve until policy makers stop focusing on bad short-term policy fixes and implement credible long-term policies, according to the chief investment officer of Altrinsic Global Advisers, John Hock.
Speaking at the MLC Investment Summit in Melbourne, Hock slammed bad short-term fixes as being responsible for the worldwide economic malaise, criticising policy makers for seeing what they wanted to see instead of dealing with the facts.
Business would not start hiring again or spending capital until government policy makers stopped "moving the goalposts", Hock said.
People are disgusted with those who create economic policy and are ready for tough love, he said.
Good policy fixes are not pleasant, he added.
Hock criticised policy makers for being too focused on getting themselves re-elected, making the policy changes necessary to get on top of economic problems "unpalatable", which was causing problems for investors and workers.
"Policy makers are in a situation right now where the facts are presented for them, but rather than looking at the facts and addressing the facts, they tend to see what they would like to see," Hock said.
Equity performance is not necessarily related to economic performance, Hock warned.
The next ten years will be characterised by sub-par global domestic product growth, lowering living standards and rising crime rates, while the value of equities increase, he said.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.