Duty of care canvassed for ratings houses
An industry round table examining the future licensing of ratings agencies has actively canvassed imposing a duty of care on the agencies with respect to retail investors.
The idea has been revealed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) in its analysis of a number of industry round tables held to examine the possibilities for the new regulatory and licensing environment.
Referring to what amounted to imposing a duty of care, the ASIC analysis said such a move could improve their accountability for poor or ineffective ratings, arguably improving ratings.
It said, however, it had been noted that introducing a duty of credit rating agencies to investors might lead to credit rating agencies potentially leaving the market.
“In addition, any court action would be costly and lengthy if such legal action did eventuate,” the ASIC analysis said.
In its final recommendations, the regulator steered clear of the duty of care proposals saying it would consider possible options for investor education addressing over-reliance on credit ratings and continue to work with credit rating agencies in progressing their Australian Financial Service License applications.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
