Duty of care canvassed for ratings houses
An industry round table examining the future licensing of ratings agencies has actively canvassed imposing a duty of care on the agencies with respect to retail investors.
The idea has been revealed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) in its analysis of a number of industry round tables held to examine the possibilities for the new regulatory and licensing environment.
Referring to what amounted to imposing a duty of care, the ASIC analysis said such a move could improve their accountability for poor or ineffective ratings, arguably improving ratings.
It said, however, it had been noted that introducing a duty of credit rating agencies to investors might lead to credit rating agencies potentially leaving the market.
“In addition, any court action would be costly and lengthy if such legal action did eventuate,” the ASIC analysis said.
In its final recommendations, the regulator steered clear of the duty of care proposals saying it would consider possible options for investor education addressing over-reliance on credit ratings and continue to work with credit rating agencies in progressing their Australian Financial Service License applications.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Insignia Financial has reached a major milestone in completing the separation of MLC Wealth from NAB, having acquired the firm back in 2021.
There could be changes ahead for how ASIC requires licensees to handle conflicts of interest as the corporate regulator announces it will be meeting key stakeholders next year to update guidance.
Proper recordkeeping has been described as the “mortar between the bricks” of the advice process and critical to an FSCP decision as an adviser is suspended for failures in this area.
As investors increasingly seek to embed ESG considerations in their portfolios, a specialist adviser has offered tips for financial planners who may feel overwhelmed in tackling these complex topics with clients.
