Double-dipping on compliance ‘choking’ FS firms

financial services industry financial services companies global financial crisis government

29 October 2014
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Financial services companies are almost matching government regulatory costs with their own self-inflicted rules, and effectively "choking themselves in red tape", a report says.

Despite being one of the industries with the highest regulatory burdens, particularly since the global financial crisis, financial services firms are still imposing additional and potentially unnecessary compliance costs to their budgets, according to Deloitte's Access Economics report Get out of your own way: Unleashing productivity.

The report showed one in five workers in the financial services realm were involved in some form of compliance work, with the ratio continuing to grow.

Some executives and middle managers were spending nine hours a week dealing with their own rules, it said.

The spending and associated red tape is particularly significant given the level of regulation imposed by the government, Deloitte Financial Services Risk and Regulation leader Kevin Nixon said.

"The sector — and authorised deposit-taking institutions in particular — have to deal with a greater intensity of imposed regulation than most, so the current Financial Services Industry Inquiry led by David Murray which is due to report its recommendations to Government in the next four weeks, is of particular relevance at this juncture," he said.

His colleague, Deloitte Banking Regulatory leader Tim Oldham, blamed post-GFC nerves for the trend, but that it needed to be unwound.

"The GFC created such anxiety about risk that self-imposed risk appetites were progressively tightened at all levels of the organisation" Oldham said.

"The key lever the financial services industry can use to manage the plethora of self- imposed rules is to challenge current duplications around processes and controls.

"By taking the view of what should go right as opposed to what could go wrong, we can help to create a culture of performance rather than compliance. We can also engage the organisation in identifying and removing the ‘dumb' rules."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS