Don't just focus on planners, says FPA
|
|
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has sought to reinforce the issue of professional obligation in financial planning as a complementary consumer safeguard to legislative obligation.
Appearing before the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch made clear her organisation’s strong view on the need for professional obligation as well as a tighter definition of the term “financial planner”.
However, Bloch also urged the members of the Parliamentary Committee not to lose sight of the broad issues confronting the financial services industry by singling out certain groups of professionals.
“In order to reach rational outcomes that achieve the balance between robust consumer protections and a vibrant and competitive industry, we must ensure all areas of concern are covered and the inquiry does not single out certain groups of professionals,” she said.
On the key question of remuneration, Bloch’s statement to the inquiry reinforced the content of its submission arguing that remuneration practices needed to be addressed by removing product providers as determinants and influencers of remuneration.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
