Dixon Advisory to pay $7.2m for breaching Corporations Act

ASIC Dixon Advisory

9 July 2021
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commissions (ASIC) has announced it has entered a conditional agreement with Dixon Advisory which will see the advisory pay a $7.2 million penalty for breaches of the Corporations Act as well as $1 million to pay ASIC’s costs of its investigation and legal proceedings. 

The heads of agreement followed court-ordered mediation to resolve civil penalty proceedings commenced by ASIC against Dixon Advisory in the Federal Court in September 2020.

ASIC said its proceedings related to best interests duties under the Corporations Act, including allegations that Dixon Advisory representatives failed to act in their clients’ best interests to provide financial advice appropriate to the clients’ circumstances.

The in-principle resolution between the two parties would be subject to approval from the court.

In the announcement made to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), E&P Financial Group Limited, which wholly owns Dixon Advisory and Superannuation Services (DASS), said that under the heads of agreement:

  • DASS agrees to pay to the Commonwealth a pecuniary penalty of $7.2 million which may be paid in two equal instalments on 31 December 2021 and 31 March 2022 if the court makes final orders in the legal proceedings before 1 November 2021
  • DASS agrees to pay ASIC’s legal costs of its investigation and the legal proceedings agreed at $1 million, which may also be paid in two equal instalments on 31 December 2021 and 31 March 2022
  • The parties consent to the making of declarations by the court to the effect that DASS contravened section 961k(2) of the Corporations Act in the period 6October 2015 to 31 May 2019 on a total of 53 occasions in relation to personal advice provided by its representatives in contravention of:
- Section 961B of the Corporations Act by not acting in the best interests of the clients in relation to the advice; and/or
- Sections 961G of the Corporations Act, by providing advice in circumstances where it was not reasonable to conclude that the advice was appropriate to the client, had the representative satisfied the duty undersection 961B to act in the best interests of the client,
  • ASIC agrees to seek no further declarations of contravention in the proceedings,
  • The parties consent to the making of orders by the court pursuant to section 1101B(1) of the Corporations Act requiring DASS, within such time and in such manner as the court thinks fit
Additionally, the EP1 board said it “wishes to make it clear that extensive management and governance changes have occurred across the group over the last two years to ensure DASS acts in its clients’ best interests at all times”.
 
The company also said it had commissioned its own external independent review of governance practices and implemented all resulting recommendations.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 3 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

4 days 22 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 2 hours ago