Disclosure regulations stopped in Senate
The Government’s proposed fee disclosure regulations have been defeated in the Senate, with the Australian Labor Party’s motion to disallow the draft rules passed with the support of the Democrats, the Greens and all the independent Senators.
Shadow Minister for Financial Services Senator Stephen Conroy proposed the motion on the basis that the regulations, which required product issuers and other participants in the financial services industry to disclose fees and charges on products under the Financial Services Reform regime in dollar terms, were “flawed” and “not in the best interest of consumers”.
Under the draft regulations, issuers would only have to disclose fees in dollar terms if it was “reasonably practicable” to do so. However, Labor felt that this test “sets the threshold for the disclosure of fees and charges too low and would have created a loophole for product issuers…to avoid disclosing in dollar terms”.
Instead, Labor and the Democrats have proposed a new test — “that disclosure in dollar terms is required unless the Australian Securities and Investments Commission determines that it is not possible due to compelling reasons”.
The Government has agreed to these new draft regulations, and is expected to introduce them into Parliament in July.
In the course of the debate on the motion, Conroy also attacked both the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) and the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) on the issue of fee disclosure saying: “The product manufacturers, issuers, floggers — call them what you will — will not, unless they are made to, provide consumers with all of the information that they need…Why is this like a wooden stake to a vampire?”
ASFA and IFSA have been given one month by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer, Ross Cameron, to come up with an agreed single figure fee disclosure model after which the Government will prepare the regulations.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
