Disclosure regime unfair says AFA

commissions disclosure AFA advisers financial advisers association of financial advisers financial services industry

13 April 2000
| By Julie Bennett |

Disclosure obligations under the proposed CLERP 6 legislation may unfairly dis-advantage some advisers, according to Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) national president John Hibberd.

Disclosure obligations under the proposed CLERP 6 legislation may unfairly dis-advantage some advisers, according to Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) national president John Hibberd.

Hibberd says that on the AFA's first reading of the legislation, it appears that while people who are salaried advisers won't have to reveal the commission on product sales, those who are self-employed will. This, he says, disadvantages advisers who are not employees.

"It's unfair because if I'm self employed, I have to reveal the benefit. How-ever, if I'm an adviser employed by, say, a bank, I don't because I get a sal-ary."

While Hibberd concedes that employed advisers don't usually receive commissions, he argues that a commission is still being paid by the client and should there-fore be subject to the same disclosure obligations.

"Most products have commissions built into them," he says. "The product price is not reduced if no commission is being paid to the adviser. What usually happens is the commission is kept by the company to pay the adviser, so that adviser is still being paid to deliver advice, and the client is still the one paying for it."

Hibberd says there are already situations in the financial services industry where the absence of commission in the transaction is portrayed as an advantage.

He says another concern is not that if a consumer uses a salaried adviser, but they do not have access to the same level of information about adviser remunera-tion. "Consumer sovereignty is compromised," he says.

The AFA has written to the Minister of Financial Services and Regulation, Joe Hockey, outlining the concerns.

The letter said, in part, "We are concerned that the proposals may unfairly dis-advantage our members in the marketplace. This would occur in situations requir-ing an adviser entitled to commission to disclose this commission, whereas a salaried adviser recommending, possibly the exact same product would have no disclosure obligation."

Round table discussions between the minister and the AFA will take place this week.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

2 months 3 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

2 months 3 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

1 week 6 days ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia's latest interest rate announcement has left punters disheartened on Melbourne Cup Day....

1 week 5 days ago

The Federal Court has given a verdict on ASIC’s case against Dixon Advisory director Paul Ryan which had alleged he breached his director duties....

1 week 4 days ago