Directors need more control
Representatives of RiskMetrics Group and JP Morgan at the WestLB Asset Management Round Table 2008 have suggested that directors and their boards need to have greater direction over their staff and watch where their management are putting company funds.
Martin Lawrence, head of Australian and New Zealand research at RiskMetrics, made the suggestion during the round table panel discussion on leverage and hedge funds in the US mortgage meltdown. Lawrence said that good directors needed to reign in their staff, direct where funds are going and provide greater accountability to shareholders.
In an interview with Money Management, Lawrence said directors had to be chosen carefully, explaining that a board of wise, experienced hands was needed.
“Boards [should be] playing a greater role in managing their staff,” said Lawrence.
“[Directors] were leaving too much to management without questioning them.”
Paul Brunker, equity strategist for JP Morgan, who was part of the panel, echoed Lawrence’s comments in a later interview.
“It follows on [from leverage, that] if we want companies to avoid leverage and risk-taking activities, boards have to be more pro-active,” he said.
Recommended for you
Far too few wealth managers are capitalising on the opportunity presented by disruptive technology to deliver personalised investment solutions to the mass affluent demographic, according to PwC.
With over half of advisers using managed accounts, HUB24’s head of managed portfolios has unpacked the benefits driving their usage and how they can be leveraged by advice practices.
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
ASX-listed platforms HUB24, Netwealth, and Praemium have used their AGMs to detail how they are using artificial intelligence to improve their processes and the innovative opportunities it presents.
