Directors need more control
Representatives of RiskMetrics Group and JP Morgan at the WestLB Asset Management Round Table 2008 have suggested that directors and their boards need to have greater direction over their staff and watch where their management are putting company funds.
Martin Lawrence, head of Australian and New Zealand research at RiskMetrics, made the suggestion during the round table panel discussion on leverage and hedge funds in the US mortgage meltdown. Lawrence said that good directors needed to reign in their staff, direct where funds are going and provide greater accountability to shareholders.
In an interview with Money Management, Lawrence said directors had to be chosen carefully, explaining that a board of wise, experienced hands was needed.
“Boards [should be] playing a greater role in managing their staff,” said Lawrence.
“[Directors] were leaving too much to management without questioning them.”
Paul Brunker, equity strategist for JP Morgan, who was part of the panel, echoed Lawrence’s comments in a later interview.
“It follows on [from leverage, that] if we want companies to avoid leverage and risk-taking activities, boards have to be more pro-active,” he said.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
