Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Director liability changes a positive

director/cash-flow/trustee/government/

31 May 2011
| By Chris Kennedy |
image
image image
expand image

Federal Budget changes making company directors personally liable when their company fails to pay employee superannuation payments could have far-reaching consequences but will ultimately benefit employees, according to Holding Redlich Lawyers.

The legislation, intended to target counter fraudulent and phoenix activity, could yet extend to all directors in a blanket approach, although we are yet to see the details, said Holding Redlich partner Jenny Willcocks.

If the legislation does end up taking a catch-all approach rather than being limited to cases where there has been a phoenix scheme in place, then it will have a significant impact on directors’ risk of personal liability, she said.

Even when there is no phoenix scheme in place a company director would usually be aware if their company is getting into trouble, and where super payments haven’t been passed onto the fund or wrongly used to pay company cash flow, she said.

The end result will be a positive from an employee or trustee perspective if it makes directors more aware and more focused on their responsibilities concerning employee super, she said.

The fact that there is discussion out there sends a positive message that the Government is taking the situation seriously from a deterrent point of view, meaning those tempted to use such schemes may think twice if they are more personally liable and there is greater capacity to go after the directors personally, she said.

What the situation really highlights is a need for an overhaul in the system of superannuation payments from employers to funds, with the lead time currently far too long and creating the potential for such dishonest conduct, Willcocks said.

If super payments had to be paid in the same way as wages, that would close the loophole allowing phoenix schemes to take place and would also benefit members, who are currently missing out on having their own money invested while it sits in an employer’s account, she said.

Homepage

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

1 day 20 hours ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND