Director guarantees to repay Seabay investors
The sole director of Seabay Investments has personally guaranteed to repay a percentage of debts totalling around $18 million to 50 investors.
Seabay Investments director Carmine Misale agreed to guarantee the repayment of 20 per cent of money owed to investors by March 1, 2009, in return for the investors forgiving the debt under deeds of compromise and forgiveness of debt they entered after the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) moved to wind up the company to recover the funds.
ASIC was taking action against Seabay as part of action against Adelaide man Guiseppe Antonio Mercorella, who had been operating an illegal scheme that allegedly owed at least 78 investors $56 million and is currently being wound up.
An ASIC investigation revealed that between about April 2003 and April 2005, Seabay entered into loan facility agreements with investors, most of whom live in South Australia. Money raised was then on-lent to Mercorella’s illegal scheme.
The Federal Court of Australia in Adelaide declared that Seabay had issued debentures in breach of the fundraising and debenture provisions of the Corporations Act 2001.
ASIC had sought orders to have the company wound up, but accepted Misale’s personal guarantee to repay the percentage of funds that Seabay and its investors had agreed to.
“ASIC has sought to improve the prospects of a return to investors by obtaining the director’s personal guarantee that investors will be paid,” ASIC’s deputy executive director enforcement Allen Turton said.
ASIC recently referred information relating to suspected criminal breaches of the Corporations Act to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions and is continuing investigations.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
