Did exam changes improve March’s pass rate?
ASIC has released the results from the latest financial adviser exam, the first to be run since changes to its structure earlier this year.
The exam held on 26 March, which had been delayed from 15 February in order to implement the changes, was the first to see the removal of short-answer questions from the exam, leaving only multiple-choice questions. The requirement that only provisional relevant providers and existing advisers could sit the exam was also removed.
The changes followed a brief Treasury consultation on draft legislation at the end of 2023 which ASIC then confirmed it would be implementing in January.
It was hoped that multiple-choice questions would be more efficient by enabling computer marking to replace manual marking which would reduce the cost of administering the exam and improve response times for candidates to receive their results.
Some 298 people sat the exam, and 70 per cent of these (210 candidates) passed the exam. The majority of the candidates at 230 were sitting the exam for the first time, ASIC said.
This pass mark was up slightly from 66 per cent in the November exam but below the highest pass mark in 2023, which was 73 per cent of candidates who sat the exam in August.
The results were issued exactly a month after sitting the exam compared to around six weeks previously.
Unsuccessful candidates will receive general feedback from the Australian Council for Educational Research on the areas they underperformed.
To date, 21,102 individual candidates have sat the exam and 92 per cent of them have passed, demonstrating their knowledge in advice construction, ethics and legal requirements.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
Would love if ASIC provided results to the individuals who sat the exam first... still waiting...