Delivery of Quality of Advice review ‘questionable’: AIOFP
 
 
                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
                            The industry is tired of reviews being passed onto third-parties, according to an industry expert, and advice must be separated from product.
In an open letter to Senator Jane Hume, Peter Johnston, executive director of the Association of Independently-Owned Financial Professionals (AIOFP), said the delivery of the Quality of Advice review, which would be led by lawyer Michelle Levy, had been questionable.
The terms of reference for the review were announced last Friday and a report was expected by 16 December, 2022.
Johnston said: “Theoretically the Government has done the sensible thing with seeking an opinion from a third party on the advice industry, but their delivery, motive and process are typically questionable.
“Advice must be separated from product to protect consumers from product failure and the industry is tired of conflicted lawyers with no practical advice experience dictating terms.
“A panel of ASIC, experienced advisers and AFCA [representing consumers] should be formed immediately after the election to sort out the compliance issue, a total duplicated mess primarily caused by lawyers and funded by consumers.”
He indicated four issues which needed to be supported by Senator Hume if she was to gain re-election.
These were:
- Consumers have a choice of a commission and a fee for service option to pay their Adviser, let the Consumer decide. Small business does not need Government overreach dictating commercial terms.
- The 60% risk commission levels needs to be elevated to at least 85/15%, this does not create a conflict.
- The FASEA exam needs to be abolished or comprehensively modified to suit the adviser’s specialty.
- A panel of ASIC, experienced advisers and AFCA sort out the compliance mess immediately after the election, not inexperienced lawyers.
Recommended for you
The top five licensees are demonstrating a “strong recovery” from losses in the first half of the year, and the gap is narrowing between their respective adviser numbers.
With many advisers preparing to retire or sell up, business advisory firm Business Health believes advisers need to take a proactive approach to informing their clients of succession plans.
Retirement commentators have flagged that almost a third of Australians over 50 are unprepared for the longevity of retirement and are falling behind APAC peers in their preparations and advice engagement.
As private markets continue to garner investor interest, Netwealth’s series of private market reports have revealed how much advisers and wealth managers are allocating, as well as a growing attraction to evergreen funds.
 
 
							 
						 
							 
						 
							 
						 
							 
						

 
							