Debt relief from the ATO not easy

ATO taxation compliance australian taxation office administrative appeals tribunal

26 June 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is being less than clear with taxpayers about their ability to have the tax office review decisions not to grant tax debt relief, according to a new Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) assessment. 

The ANAO assessment looked at the ATO’s management of debt relief arrangements and found that while the tax office was fulfilling the vast majority of obligations and managing the system well, the information it provided with respect to how to pursue a review of debt relief decisions was less than clear. 

“Taxpayers can request the ATO to review a decision not to grant relief from their debt.

However, information provided by the ATO about the main options for review is not clear in all instances,” the Auditor-General’s report said. 

“Notably, the ATO website advises taxpayers that they cannot dispute or disagree with a general interest charge decision through the objections process, only advising taxpayers that they can contact the ATO to discuss the matter,” it said.

“Further, it does not advise that complaints and objections regarding release decisions are dealt with differently by the ATO.” 

The ANAO review said that while the ATO’s processes for managing taxpayers’ objections were sound, “it would be helpful if the ATO better communicated the processes for disputing or disagreeing with their decisions”. 

The review noted that there had been relatively few objections and reviews of the ATO’s debt release decisions upheld in recent years, with only four of 209 objections finalised in 2011-12 being upheld - representing less than 2 per cent. 

It said that, similarly, one of 12 appeals to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal was upheld. 

The ANAO report pointed out that the value of debts subject to some form of debt relief in 2011-12 was $4.6 billion. 

It said that, of this amount, $2.4 billion was not pursued either because the debts were uneconomic to pursue or irrecoverable at law.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

2 months 3 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

2 months 3 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

1 week 6 days ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia's latest interest rate announcement has left punters disheartened on Melbourne Cup Day....

1 week 5 days ago

The Federal Court has given a verdict on ASIC’s case against Dixon Advisory director Paul Ryan which had alleged he breached his director duties....

1 week 4 days ago