Debt consolidation providers under ASIC review
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has raised concerns about the standard of record-keeping practices of a number of Australian credit licensees.
As part of its review of debt consolidation providers, the regulator flagged 82 client files that were reviewed across 17 licensed providers.
In 30 per cent of files, the licensee failed to record or keep sufficient information to identify the consumer’s pre-existing credit contracts.
In general, providers did not appear to document whether potential significant risks and costs of debt consolidation had been discussed with consumers, along with inadequate recording of the consumer’s objectives and financial situation.
According to the review, there were also discrepancies on some assessments of loan suitability and the eventual loan application.
ASIC Deputy Chairman Peter Kell said consumers should be aware that debt consolidation, while it can be beneficial, is not appropriate for all borrowers.
This is specifically due to the risks and costs that come with extending the term of a loan, moving to an interest-only loan without an appropriate exit strategy, and the transferring of default risk of previously unsecured debt onto the family home, he said.
“It is essential that providers ensure the debt reduction strategy they are proposing meets the consumer’s requirements and objectives and is affordable both in the short and long term,” he said.
“We will continue to monitor this sector closely and will take action where we see adverse outcomes for consumers.”
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
