Cutting the pay-for-ratings model could be a 'game changer'

research-houses/ASIC/financial-advisers/financial-services-industry/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/fund-manager/

21 June 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

With submissions still being considered by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), it is essential that the financial services industry understands the potential ramifications of removing the current pay-for-ratings model of research houses, according to Zenith Investment Partners.

Submissions to ASIC's Consultation Paper 171 - Strengthening the regulation of research report providers (including research houses) - closed in February, but research providers are yet to be provided with any indication of how the regulatory guide will look.

According to John Nicoll, Zenith's national sales manager, key to the proposed guide will be ASIC's decision on the pay for ratings model, which could potentially be a "game changer" for the research houses.

He said if the regulator were to eliminate this model, the quality of fund reviews could fall dramatically.

"Potentially, the research that will be available to the market will be very simple, one page, quantitative driven research that's not going to add much value to financial advisers' businesses," he said.

Nicoll said a drop in the standards of the research process could also see more risky managed funds passing the review process and coming to market than is currently the case.

If ASIC makes the decision to completely cut the pay-for-ratings model, it needs to take into account every form of subsidy that a fund manager provides a research provider, including sponsorship and payment for data, he said.

"I think once ASIC looks a bit deeper - and they already are - they will realise most research houses are really tight when it comes to their review process."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

Entireti has unveiled the new name for the AMP financial advice businesses that it acquired last year....

4 weeks ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

2 weeks 6 days ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS