CSA calls for share register privacy
Chartered Secretaries Australia (CSA) yesterday unveiled a proposal to deny third parties access to company share registers except under strict controlled conditions.
The governance professionals’ body proposes to deny third-party share register access unless a shareholder has consented or the third party has lodged a bidder statement with ASIC regarding a takeover of a company.
A third measure denies access unless ASIC or the courts have directed that a third party be given access to the share register, and that person satisfies a “proper purpose” test similar to that applied in the UK.
CSA chief executive Tim Sheehy called for “both sides of politics to show explicit support for the measures to prevent third parties from raiding personal shareholder details through the share register”.
“Whichever party gains office must be prepared to give shareholders privacy rights that are at least equal to what other investors such as bank customers and super fund members currently enjoy.”
Sheehy said it was “of concern” to the CSA that “anyone can currently obtain a copy of a company’s share register simply by paying a nominal fee”.
“This allows unauthorised persons to access highly personal shareholder information with very few restrictions, including their names, addresses and holding sizes.”
It also provides “a tantalising opportunity for unscrupulous profiteers to prey on vulnerable shareholders by approaching them to acquire their shares at well below market value”, he added.
“It is retail shareholders; ordinary ‘mum and dad’ investors who are at greatest risk here and therefore in greatest need of protection.”
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
