Crouching tiger, hidden designation: financial planning in Asia

financial planning financial planning association insurance CFP financial planning industry certified financial planner AFA life insurance

15 July 2003
| By Ben Abbott |

Early this year, an international battle between the controllers of the Certified Financial Planner (CFP) and Chartered Financial Practitioner (ChFP) designations erupted in the Asia-Pacific.

The Financial Planning Association of Singapore (FPAS), which issues the CFP designation, served a writ against the Insurance and Financial Practitioners Association of Singapore (IFPAS), alleging that the ChFP mark too closely resembled the CFP.

It mirrored a similar stoush in Australia between theAssociation of Financial Advisers(AFA) and theFinancial Planning Association(FPA) at the end of 2002, which led to the AFA backing down on its proposal to adopt the ChFP designation.

The dispute in Singapore being negotiated between the two associations has the potential to be repeated across Asia. The IFPAS is only one of the 11 life underwriters associations within the greater Asia Pacific Life Insurance Council (APLIC), which has adopted the ChFP mark to symbolise the growing level of education and professionalism of advisers under its umbrella.

Though the designation duel is yet to be played out, the move by insurance associations in Asia to take on professional designations and increase education standards is a symptom of an advisory industry trying to distance itself from its infancy.

APLIC board member and past AFA president John Hibberd says the advisory industry in Asia is still caught in the life insurance broking and product selling phase, and is struggling through the first stages of a transition towards advice-based planning.

He says that between 85 and 90 per cent of advisers in Asia are tied to institutions and that less than 20 per cent are up to CFP standard.

The majority of advisory businesses in Asia are the arms of large financial services groups in search of distribution and sales, according to Hibberd, resulting in businesses with massive infrastructure. This means there are teams of up to 600 advisers, paid on low commission bases and focusing on selling volumes of products to large organisational client bases.

Despite this, the advice-based model of financial planning has started to make inroads in the region, with relatively young planning associations in countries such as Hong Kong, India, South Korea and Malaysia promoting the benefits of financial advice while educating members up to the level of the CFP.

Financial Planning Standards Board (FPSB) chief executive Noel Maye says this growth has come from a need for financial advice in Asia, as opposed to just products, as life expectancies and retirements lengthen and governments give increasing retirement responsibility to individuals, resulting in a growing uncertainty about the financial choices and products available.

The key to this growth spurt in financial services within Asia has been evolving legislation, though Maye says regulation that lags behind the marketplace is the biggest challenge the financial planning industry in Asia faces.

He says Taiwan’s Financial Holding Company Act of 2001 has opened up vast potential for growth, but China’s marketplace is still regulated along restrictive functional lines, making it hard for someone to practice financial planning.

Singapore has been a particular regulatory success story for financial planners. The introduction in October last year of the Financial Advisers Act (FAA) streamlined the laws governing planners to allow more independence from institutions.

Hong Kong’s legislation is following just behind that of Singapore, with regulators there looking at the Australian financial planning model as a guide for their own changes.

Maye says that financial planning in Asia, as growth continues, is likely to follow a similar pattern to the rest of the world, with planning evolving at the high end of the market.

However, Hibberd believes there is a long way to go in the transition from product-based distribution to advice-based planning, estimating that Singapore and Hong Kong are five years behind the Australian market, while India could be up to 20 years behind.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

5 days 18 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 9 hours ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

4 weeks 1 day ago