Consumers need legal representation in financial disputes
A one-stop shop to resolve financial disputes is a welcome step and consumers could benefit from it but they need to have the right to legal representation to ensure a level playing field, according to Maurice Blackburn Lawyers.
Maurice Blackburn’s principal, Kim Shaw, said that the cause of many disputes for consumers in Australia was vertical integration or cross-selling of banking and financial products so any measure that would help simplify the financial dispute complaint process would be a win for consumers.
“However, what is missing is any detail on ensuring that consumers have the right to legal representation in navigating financial disputes against banks and financial groups through the new framework ,” he said.
“Banks absolutely will be represented by lawyers in challenging disputes raised by consumers, but unlike the banks and financial service providers, consumers essentially have one hand tied behind their backs because they do not have the benefit of a team of lawyers on the payroll to assist them in a dispute.
“We would also continue to urge the Federal Government to actively pursue an enforceable code of conduct for the finance and insurance industry and a scheme of last resort – both of which were referenced in the interim report from the Ramsay Review but are yet to be acted on.”
The law firm’s comments came after the Federal Government formally responded to the interim report of the Ramsay Review of the financial system external dispute resolution (EDR) framework, including accepting the recommendation of a single EDR body for all financial disputes, known as the Australian Financial Complaints Authority.
This would replace the current Financial Ombudsman Service, the Credit and Investments Ombudsman and the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal.
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
