Consumers fail to recognise cost of advice
New research has confirmed most Australian consumers are not prepared to pay big dollars for financial advice, with most believing it should cost just $300 upfront.
That is the bottom line of new research released by Investment Trends this week, which found that the average Australian adult believed the $300 figure was appropriate.
The research was contained in the Investment Trends 2010 Planner Business Model report, which drew on a survey of investors conducted in December last year and a survey of financial planners completed this month.
According to Investment Trends analyst Recep Peker, the preliminary results revealed that, on average, investors believed financial advice should cost $300 for the first visit and $300 for subsequent visits.
“Yet the average financial planner estimates that the break-even cost of providing full advice was $2,700 and providing simple advice was $1,200,” he said.
The research found that, similarly, planners estimated that, on average, the cost of maintaining a client file, including periodic reviews, was $1,400 a year.
Commenting on the results, Peker said it had revealed a striking disconnect between the expectations of planners and their clients.
“It also suggests that many investors may be unaware of the true cost of advice under existing asset-based fee models,” he said.
However, the research also revealed that while consumers might baulk at paying more than $300 for their first visit to a planner, they were typically willing to pay more to have their strategies reviewed.
“Generally, investors seem willing to pay more once they have had firsthand experience with financial planners,” Peker said.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.