Consultation opens on super performance test design
The government has launched a consultation to look into design options of the annual superannuation performance test.
According to the government, while the test has improved member returns through an increased focus on poor performing products and holding trustees to account, there is evidence that “the test may be influencing investment decisions to the detriment of member outcomes, including discouraging investment in asset classes that may otherwise be in the best financial interests of members”.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the consultation is aimed at ensuring super funds are able to invest in ways that deliver the best possible returns for members and is not the government “directing super investment”.
“The performance test holds trustees to account for the investment performance they deliver and the fees they charge. Since its introduction, it has helped lift the investment performance of super funds by encouraging continual improvement and the exit of underperforming funds,” he said.
“The performance test is driving good outcomes, but industry has raised concerns that the current test is holding back investment in some sectors that could provide strong returns for members, such as the energy transition and affordable housing.”
He added that the test benchmarks were “never meant to serve as a prescription on how to invest”, although that has been the view of a number of industry stakeholders.
Submissions for the consultation close on 19 April 2024.
Earlier this year, ASIC flagged that advisers and licensees were not always addressing underperformance in super options.
Having reviewed 88 advice files across 26 advice licensees, focusing on advice provided about nine options that all persistently failed to meet performance expectations, the regulator said it was considering a “range of regulatory responses” where the results of the review were “concerning”.
This, it said, included 11 files where it identified advice deficiencies revolving around failure to undertake reasonable assessment of the underperforming option nor explain why retention was appropriate. In these cases, advisers recommended clients retain between 38 per cent and 100 per cent of their superannuation balances in an underperforming option, ASIC said.
The regulator said its review confirmed advice licensees and advisers should undertake performance-focused due diligence before offering investment options to members, approving options for use by advisers or recommending them to members.
Last year, Treasurer Chalmers had flagged a performance test consultation would be in the pipeline to improve the super performance test amid claims it disincentivises sustainable investment from funds.
This followed the Treasurer’s third investor roundtable in December 2023, in which some of Australia’s largest investors representing more than $2.5 trillion in capital were present to discuss various issues.
“The government will consult on options to improve the superannuation performance test so that trustees are held to account for member outcomes without holding back investment in economic priorities such as the net zero transformation and housing,” Chalmers’ statement wrote.
The superannuation performance test, which has applied to MySuper products since 1 July 2021, was introduced to protect Australians’ retirement savings by holding trustees to account for the investment performance they deliver and the fees they charge to members.
It was extended to trustee-directed products, a subset of the choice accumulation sector, from 1 July 2023.
In the latest performance test, APRA found 96 trustee directed products, which included 20 of 500 non-platform products and 76 of 305 platform products, along with one MySuper product, failed to meet the benchmark.
AUTHOR
Rhea Nath
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
