Consultation opens on Quality of Advice terms of reference
The Government has opened consultation on next year’s Quality of Advice Review which is receiving submissions until 4 February, 2022.
Treasury said the review would consider whether the measures that had been implemented by Government, regulators and financial services entities since the Hayne Royal Commission, had improved the quality of financial advice and whether further reforms were needed.
Consistent with recommendations 2.3, 2.5 and 2.6 of the royal commission, the draft review stated it would consider how the regulatory framework could better enable the provision of high quality, accessible and affordable financial advice for retail investors.
The review would examine:
- Concepts such as general and personal advice;
- Safe harbour provisions for the best interest duty;
- Disclosure requirements including statements of advice;
- Recent reforms to annual renewal for ongoing fee arrangements;
- Life insurance remuneration reforms;
- The remaining exemptions to the ban on conflicted remuneration in life and general insurance;
- The processes through which investors were designated as sophisticated investors and wholesale clients;
- The application of the advice framework to certain activities and professions such as accountants;
- Actions undertaken by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), including regulatory guidance and class orders; and
- The role of financial services entities including professional associations.
Treasury said the review would be led by an independent reviewer who would provide a report to Government by 16 December, 2022.
AUTHOR
Liam Cormican
Recommended for you
ASIC has issued infringement notices to two AFSLs over financial advisers providing personal advice while they were unregistered.
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes by as much as 51 per cent through comprehensive financial advice, according to a Vanguard study, but cost continues to be an issue.
AMP has announced a senior appointment to its North leadership team, reinforcing the firm’s commitment to the advice industry.
Despite the financial adviser exam being rooted in ethics, two professional year advisers believe the lack of support and transparency from the regulator around the exam is unethical.
