Commissions not the only factor in high super fees
|
|
A key superannuation research house has released a new analysis which concludes that removing commissions from current superannuation products will not succeed in reducing average super fees below the Federal Government’s proposed target of 1 per cent.
The Heron Partnership analysis covered 117 major retail and industry superannuation products and found that the current average fee was 1.27 per cent for an account balance of $50,000, 1.35 per cent for a balance of $25,000 and 1.22 per cent for a balance of $100,000.
Importantly, these fees excluded any fees paid for financial advice, it said.
Commenting on the analysis, Heron Partnership managing director Chris Butler said superannuation funds typically charged administration and investment fees, which varied from fund to fund depending on an individual’s fund balance and investment structure.
“Of the 117 superannuation products analysed based on an account balance of $50,000, 68 funds would need to restructure their fees to be at 1 per cent or less,” he said.
Butler said as a result of the various fee structures, there was a considerable difference between the retirement outcomes of the various products.
Further, he said only looking at costs or past investment returns would not be sufficient to select a super fund suitable for a person for up to 40 or more years.
“We therefore recommend that individuals seek advice from a financial planner to assist them in selecting the product that best suits their requirements,” Butler said.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has cancelled a Sydney AFSL for failing to pay a $64,000 AFCA determination related to inappropriate advice, which then had to be paid by the CSLR.
A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments for investments.
Inefficient data processes and systems mean advisers are spending over half of their time on product implementation and administration at the expense of clients, according to research.
With the regulator announcing its enforcement focus for 2025 last week, law firm Hall & Wilcox examines the areas which have dropped down the list in priority for the regulator.
