Clients won’t give up commissions

commissions remuneration fee-for-service financial adviser financial advisers money management

5 October 2007
| By Sara Rich |
image
image
expand image

Mark Rantall

Many clients are reluctant to give up commission-based arrangements with their financial advisers, according to fee-for-service dealer group GodfreyPembroke.

The dealer group has clarified its financial adviser remuneration model by explaining that existing clients can still opt for commissions and that the majority do.

The MLC-owned business’ managing director Mark Rantall told Money Management that while existing clients have been encouraged to transfer across to fee-for-service, he believes the majority are happy with their current arrangement and don’t want to change.

However, from October last year, fee-for-service has become the only option available to new clients.

According to Rantall, this flexible approach has seen an increase in client numbers as well as no clients lost.

“A number of clients have rung up on the basis we operate on a fee-for-service basis and have been attracted to that model,” he said.

“Also, the feedback we’re getting is that clients are comforted by the fact that when they are offered these investments they are totally transparent and they are able to understand what the adviser is paid and what they get for what they pay, and they have control over that transaction.”

Rantall added that adviser attitudes towards the change have also been positive.

“This initiative was predominately an adviser-driven initiative, so we did it as a collective rather than dictating it from the head office environment,” he said.

“We have lost no advisers over it — in fact, I think it has put us in good stead because, as far as I’m aware, we are the only institutional licensee on a national basis that has mandated fee-for-service.”

Rantall explained that a primary reason for moving the dealer group across to a fee-for-service model was to differentiate itself from its competitors.

“A number of our constituents believe in operating on a fee-for-service basis for two reasons. Firstly, it’s totally transparent in terms of the fees that are charged to clients. And, secondly, it allows the clients to have control over the transaction, so if a client chooses not to receive advice in the future then they have control over turning that fee off, whereas with a trailing commission they don’t have control over that.”

Godfrey Pembroke advisers are monitored by an audit process to ensure they are adhering to the company-wide remuneration standard.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS