Class action filed against AMP on BOLR
AMP Limited has confirmed receipt of a class action filing from AMP financial planners.
The company announced to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) today that a class action had been filed against AMP Financial Planning Pty Ltd in the Federal Court in Melbourne.
It said the proceeding had been brought on behalf of certain financial advisers who are or had been authorised by AMP Financial Planning.
It said the claim related to changes made by AMP Financial Planning to its Buyer of Last Resort policy in 2019.
The company said it was confident in the actions it took in 2019 and would defend the proceeding accordingly.
In a statement issued shortly after the AMP ASX announcement, the Advisers Association (TAA) said it was supportive of its members, following the filing of an 'open' class action against AMP Financial Planning (AMPFP) on behalf of AMP financial planner members by Corrs Chambers Westgarth in the Federal Court of Australia.
TAA chief executive, Neil Macdonald, said many members, both those exiting and those staying, had joined the class action, which follows AMPFP’s decision to reduce its adviser network and cut the amount it would pay for their businesses under its Buyer of Last Resort (BOLR) terms, without notice, from 4 times recurring revenue to a maximum of 2.5 times.
“We would have preferred, and we continue to prefer, that AMPFP work with the association to negotiate fair and reasonable outcomes for all members,” he said. “This is obviously imperative for those who are exiting, but it is just as important to those who are staying, so that they can continue to provide Australians with affordable access to financial advice.”
The Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman has referred over 60 BOLR-related cases for mediation, after receiving over 100 complaints from AMP financial planners related to the BOLR changes. ALP Senator Deborah O’Neill has called for a review of AMP’s behaviour.
Mr Macdonald said many members had bought businesses from AMPFP at 4 times recurring revenue, on the promise that AMPFP would acquire their businesses back on the same multiple when they leave, a key plank in AMPFP’s ecosystem.
“These are businesses that were valued by AMPFP for lending purposes at 4 times recurring revenue and in most cases were funded by AMP Bank loans or via another tripartite banking arrangement, again at 4 times recurring revenue,” Macdonald said. “In many cases advisers had to put up their family homes as security and are now at risk of losing them. Many of our members stated they had little choice but to join the class action."
Recommended for you
The FAAA is hopeful that it can achieve co-regulation by 2030, acting as a stepping stone towards its ultimate goal of a fully self-regulated financial advice profession within a decade, says chair David Sharpe.
A team of specialists can provide a better experience for clients, according to Findex, with advisers and accountants urged to have a close relationship.
With multiple funds seeing assets frozen, three platforms have shared with Money Management how they guard against holding a troubled product and how much responsibility sits with the adviser.
The Federal Court has given a verdict on ASIC’s case against Dixon Advisory director Paul Ryan which had alleged he breached his director duties.
