CIO rejects single financial services tribunal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/381e7/381e7b93d1813d03a3680b6f20435c7ada524234" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/381e7/381e7b93d1813d03a3680b6f20435c7ada524234" alt="image"
The Credit and Investments Ombudsman (CIO) has rejected the Coalition Members' recommendation that a single tribunal should be established for all financial services complaints.
The CIO said the recommendation to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics in their report on the Big Four banks was a political solution to the reputation problems of the Big Four.
CIO chief executive and ombudsman, Raj Venga, said: "Unfortunately it is the innocent smaller players within the financial services sector who will pay the price. This is clearly a win for the big four banks".
"The Tribunal solution, or indeed one which involves a single ombudsman scheme, will force all small financial services providers to join a scheme which is set up to deal with the big four banks," Venga said.
"This is all fine if we want our financial system to remain uncompetitive. Larger dominant providers can afford high costs and simply pass the inefficiency on to consumers in the form of high rates and charges.
"If we want efficiency for the benefit of all consumers and the economy, we need a system of dispute resolution which facilitates increased competitiveness in financial services."
The CIO called on the Government to target its response to the problems in the sector and to the organisations which had caused them.
"If a tribunal is politically necessary, we suggest that its scope is limited to the areas that the existing Ombudsman schemes do not cover," Venga said.
"This way the very successful Ombudsman schemes already operating in Australia will be left alone to continue their highly valuable work."
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.