Churn lacks evidence, definition

LICG

3 August 2016
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

The arguments for churn as an issue in the life insurance industry lacks evidence, statistics and a solid definition, a risk adviser group has argued.

The Life Insurance Consumer Group (LICG) has issued a statement arguing that reforms would fail to tackle intentional or unintentional non-disclosure by clients on changes in health conditions. Reforms would also fail to protect consumers who ignore medical recommendations.

The group also said replacing policies might be in the best interests of the clients as it might result in premium savings, improved benefits and updated definitions.

"Advisers are damned if they do, damned if they don't," the group said.

The comments came in response to media coverage of a 40-year-old Sydney IT consultant, who it said was a victim of churning in 2011. The insurer denied the claim because of non-fraudulent, non-disclosure within the first three years but the claim would have been paid if the client had remained in the previous policy.

However, the LICG argued that the claimant had ignored medical advice to have a fatty tissue deposit on his neck checked by a medical professional.

It also argued that if the adviser had been aware of the medical issue, they would have kept the original policy or postponed the change until the medical issue was resolved.

"If this adviser was only acting in self-interest then they deserve to be punished and banned from the industry. No evidence exists to blame all advisers based on this isolated example of consumer detriment."

"The problem for the FSC (Financial Services Council) is that statistics might prove there is no problem of ‘churn' which would spoil the story and prevent the FSC members' self-serving ‘fixing' of adviser remuneration and clawback provisions," the group said.

It said that if the FSC and consumer groups were concerned about consumer outcomes, they would have considered all angles of this story, instead of using it to "supposedly prove a false premise".

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 3 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 3 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS