Churn lacks evidence, definition

LICG/

3 August 2016
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

The arguments for churn as an issue in the life insurance industry lacks evidence, statistics and a solid definition, a risk adviser group has argued.

The Life Insurance Consumer Group (LICG) has issued a statement arguing that reforms would fail to tackle intentional or unintentional non-disclosure by clients on changes in health conditions. Reforms would also fail to protect consumers who ignore medical recommendations.

The group also said replacing policies might be in the best interests of the clients as it might result in premium savings, improved benefits and updated definitions.

"Advisers are damned if they do, damned if they don't," the group said.

The comments came in response to media coverage of a 40-year-old Sydney IT consultant, who it said was a victim of churning in 2011. The insurer denied the claim because of non-fraudulent, non-disclosure within the first three years but the claim would have been paid if the client had remained in the previous policy.

However, the LICG argued that the claimant had ignored medical advice to have a fatty tissue deposit on his neck checked by a medical professional.

It also argued that if the adviser had been aware of the medical issue, they would have kept the original policy or postponed the change until the medical issue was resolved.

"If this adviser was only acting in self-interest then they deserve to be punished and banned from the industry. No evidence exists to blame all advisers based on this isolated example of consumer detriment."

"The problem for the FSC (Financial Services Council) is that statistics might prove there is no problem of ‘churn' which would spoil the story and prevent the FSC members' self-serving ‘fixing' of adviser remuneration and clawback provisions," the group said.

It said that if the FSC and consumer groups were concerned about consumer outcomes, they would have considered all angles of this story, instead of using it to "supposedly prove a false premise".

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

Entireti has unveiled the new name for the AMP financial advice businesses that it acquired last year....

4 weeks ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

2 weeks 6 days ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS