Choosing platforms solely based on price breaches best interest
Financial advisers focusing solely on price when it comes to advising clients on a superannuation or investment platform may not meet their legal obligations, according to The Fold Legal.
In a report on platform advice, commissioned by Netwealth, the law firm said there had long been a tendency for advisers to let the price of a platform determine their recommendation, rather than looking at the needs, objectives and preferences of clients.
The Fold Legal said the issue with focusing on price alone was that platforms were financial products, not just technology solutions.
“This means that you’re providing financial product advice each time you advise a client on which platform they should invest through,” it said.
“With financial product advice comes a range of legal obligations (in the Corporations Act and, more recently, the Financial Advisers Standards and Ethics Authority code of ethics) that require you to ensure your advice is appropriate and in the best interests of your client.”
The law firm said while price was a relevant consideration, age, life stage, attitude towards advice, level of financial and digital literacy, and desire for specific platform features were factors that also needed to be considered.
It said when recommending a financial product advisers should:
- Act with integrity and in the best interests of your client;
- Capture the client’s needs, objectives and preferences and base your recommendation on those needs, objectives and preferences;
- If there is a conflict, prioritise your client’s interests above your own;
- Ensure your recommendation is appropriate for, and adequately addresses, your client’s needs, objectives and preferences;
- Form a view as to whether the recommendation is likely to leave the client in a better position;
- Satisfy yourself that your client understands the benefits, costs and risks of your recommendation; and
- Satisfy yourself that the costs of the recommended product are fair and reasonable, and represent value for money for your client.
Recommended for you
A financial advice firm has been penalised $11 million in the Federal Court for providing ‘cookie cutter advice’ to its clients and breaching conflicted remuneration rules.
Insignia Financial has experienced total quarterly net outflows of $1.8 billion as a result of client rebalancing, while its multi-asset flows halved from the prior quarter.
Prime Financial is looking to shed its “sleeping giant” reputation with larger M&A transactions going forward, having agreed to acquire research firm Lincoln Indicators.
An affiliate of Pinnacle Investment Management has expanded its reach with a London office as the fund manager seeks to grow its overseas distribution into the UK and Europe.
