Choosing platforms solely based on price breaches best interest

the-fold-legal/netwealth/price/superannuation/investment-platforms/

2 December 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image image
expand image

Financial advisers focusing solely on price when it comes to advising clients on a superannuation or investment platform may not meet their legal obligations, according to The Fold Legal.

In a report on platform advice, commissioned by Netwealth, the law firm said there had long been a tendency for advisers to let the price of a platform determine their recommendation, rather than looking at the needs, objectives and preferences of clients.

The Fold Legal said the issue with focusing on price alone was that platforms were financial products, not just technology solutions.

“This means that you’re providing financial product advice each time you advise a client on which platform they should invest through,” it said.

“With financial product advice comes a range of legal obligations (in the Corporations Act and, more recently, the Financial Advisers Standards and Ethics Authority code of ethics) that require you to ensure your advice is appropriate and in the best interests of your client.”

The law firm said while price was a relevant consideration, age, life stage, attitude towards advice, level of financial and digital literacy, and desire for specific platform features were factors that also needed to be considered.

It said when recommending a financial product advisers should:

  • Act with integrity and in the best interests of your client;
  • Capture the client’s needs, objectives and preferences and base your recommendation on those needs, objectives and preferences;
  • If there is a conflict, prioritise your client’s interests above your own;
  • Ensure your recommendation is appropriate for, and adequately addresses, your client’s needs, objectives and preferences;
  • Form a view as to whether the recommendation is likely to leave the client in a better position;
  • Satisfy yourself that your client understands the benefits, costs and risks of your recommendation; and
  • Satisfy yourself that the costs of the recommended product are fair and reasonable, and represent value for money for your client.
Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 1 week ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 2 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

2 weeks 2 days ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision following this week's monetary policy meeting....

3 weeks 4 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

4 days 22 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo