CHOICE calls for ban on asset-based fees
Consumer advocate group CHOICE has called for more stringency around financial advice conflicts of interest, such as asset-based fees, stressing regulation is the gateway to restoring trust in the profession.
In a submission to the Financial System Inquiry, CHOICE pointed to recent financial advice scandals as evidence financial advisers are "too often" putting personal gain before the client's best interests.
Despite regulatory efforts to remove conflicts, like the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms, CHOICE said asset-based fees are still common practice and should be targeted by regulators.
"Asset-based fees have many of the same market distorting features created by commissions, which have been recognised as inappropriate for advisers and largely, although not entirely, excised from the industry," it said in its submission.
The website also called for a ban on sales-based fees, which it said would "reinvigorate a sales-driven culture" and promote mis-selling.
"CHOICE believes that financial advisers should be banned from accepting any commissions, trails and asset-based fees due to the influence these forms of payment have on the quality of advice."
Among its other recommendations, CHOICE asked the inquiry to examine a clearer delineation between institutional and independent advisers.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
