CHOICE calls for ban on asset-based fees
Consumer advocate group CHOICE has called for more stringency around financial advice conflicts of interest, such as asset-based fees, stressing regulation is the gateway to restoring trust in the profession.
In a submission to the Financial System Inquiry, CHOICE pointed to recent financial advice scandals as evidence financial advisers are "too often" putting personal gain before the client's best interests.
Despite regulatory efforts to remove conflicts, like the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms, CHOICE said asset-based fees are still common practice and should be targeted by regulators.
"Asset-based fees have many of the same market distorting features created by commissions, which have been recognised as inappropriate for advisers and largely, although not entirely, excised from the industry," it said in its submission.
The website also called for a ban on sales-based fees, which it said would "reinvigorate a sales-driven culture" and promote mis-selling.
"CHOICE believes that financial advisers should be banned from accepting any commissions, trails and asset-based fees due to the influence these forms of payment have on the quality of advice."
Among its other recommendations, CHOICE asked the inquiry to examine a clearer delineation between institutional and independent advisers.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
