Challenger gets ethical
Challenger Portfolio Management is to become the latest group to jump on the ethical funds band wagon when it takes over management of the Tyndall Ethical Balanced Investment Trust next month
Challenger Portfolio Management is to become the latest group to jump on the ethical funds band wagon when it takes over management of the Tyndall Ethical Balanced Investment Trust next month.
The Tyndall fund will be renamed the Challenger Socially Responsive Investment Fund (Challenger SRI) and will invest in socially responsive companies selected from the top 300 companies in the ASX All Ordinaries Index.
Challenger general manager of managed investments, Martin Ashe, says the group is introducing the funds in response to client demand and because Challenger expects the investments to provide attractive returns.
“Not only has there been a demand from our clients for a fund of this type, but we believe that socially responsive companies will post attractive returns for their shareholders over the longer term,” he says.
The Tyndall Ethical Balanced Investment Trust currently manages about $12 million on behalf of retail investors. The new Challenger fund will offer both wholesale and retail funds with minimum investment in the retail fund pegged at $1,000.
On the wholesale side, Challenger already has a commitment of $5 million from a church organisation for the SRI wholesale fund and is currently talking with other institutions which have expressed interest in the fund.
Ashe says the investment process will consist of two distinct, complementary aspects.
“The first aspect involves an investment analysis of each company, applying Challenger Portfolio Management’s active ‘quality/value’ investment approach. The second aspect involves an assessment of the social responsiveness of those companies which present the best investment opportunities.”
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
