CFS global property funds reassigned S&P rating
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) bumped Colonial First State’s (CFS’s) Global Property Securities funds from ‘on hold’ status to a three-star rating. High staff turnover led the research house to place the funds on hold in April when the head of global property securities, John Snowden, left the team.
S&P revised the rating following the promotion of senior portfolio manager Andrew Nicholas to top spot, noting that he was the funds team’s third manager in less than three years.
S&P fund services analyst Nathan Bode said they will be “looking for improved team stability in the future”, noting that further turnover in staff is likely to reduce S&P’s “conviction in the manager’s ability to select and retain key investment staff”.
“S&P considers CFS’s intention to appoint another Hong Kong-based analyst to focus on Asian-listed property securities, and to augment the two-person Europe/UK team with a new appointment, as important commitments to the capability — given the small size of the investment team and the disparate nature of the Asian and European property securities markets,” Bode said.
S&P said “a competitive advantage of the capability is the investment team’s access to the CFS equities, credit and infrastructure investment teams”. CFS’s listed property team also benefits from a strategic joint venture with Colliers International, which gives them access to “additional data and insights not available to some of the other rated managers”.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
