CFD leverage reduced
The corporate regulator’s order to reduce contracts for difference (CFDs) leverage available to retail clients took effect from Monday.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said its CFD product intervention order strengthened protections for retail clients trading CFDs after it found CFDs were likely to result in significant detriment to retail clients.
The intervention order also targeted CFD product features and sales practices that amplified retail clients’ CFD losses, such as providing inducements to become a client or to trade.
The maximum CFD leverage available to retail clients would range from 30:1 to a 2:1 depending on the underlying asset class. Previously, CFD exposure could be 500 times the original outlay.
ASIC said contravention of the order was five years imprisonment for individuals and penalties of up to $555 million for corporations. The order would remain for 18 months, and could be extended or made permanent after that.
ASIC commissioner, Cathie Armour, said: “We will closely monitor compliance with the product intervention order and won’t hesitate to take appropriate action to enforce the order.
“We are also paying careful attention to changes in CFD providers’ reported holdings of retail client money and any mis-classification of retail clients as wholesale clients, which would risk denying them important rights and protections. Protecting retail investors from harm, particularly at a time of heightened vulnerability, is a priority for ASIC.”
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
