CBA Storm Financial Resolution Scheme underway
Law firm Slater and Gordon (S&G), which is representing many former Storm Financial clients, has announced that a dispute resolution process between Storm clients and the Commonwealth Bank (CBA) designed to avoid a lengthy litigation process has now been put in place.
Already 1,000 of the estimated 2,500 former Storm investors who had loans with CBA and Colonial First State have shown interest in the scheme, which will provide a process in an attempt to resolve the claims in a more timely and cost efficient manner than going through the courts.
“We want to put these people in the best position possible, we want them to keep their homes,” S&G lawyer Ben Hardwick said.
An S&G statement said the scheme would enable clients’ circumstances to be reviewed by CBA while there would also be a full disclosure of documents and facts by the bank.
S&G will provide independent legal and financial advice paid for by CBA. A former high court justice, Ian Callinan, will provide independent determinations where agreement cannot be reached between CBA and the client.
In addition, a caveat in the scheme enables Storm victims to withdraw from the scheme at any stage and proceed with court action, according to Hardwick.
Any determination in the scheme is not binding on the Storm customer but will be binding on the bank, Hardwick said.
Recommended for you
Clime’s disposal of advice licensee Madison “needed to happen yesterday”, managing director Michael Baragwanath has told Money Management, as he concludes a severe cost-out period at the business.
As Viola Private Wealth continues on its growth trajectory, the wealth management firm has appointed a seasoned investment professional to be its first chief investment officer.
Financial advisers who wish to implement artificial intelligence in their practices need to undergo a change in their mindset as to how they use technology.
With United Global Capital expected to constitute a substantial portion of CSLR compensation in FY25–26, what has AFCA ruled in its determinations on the company so far?
