CBA appoints international experts to review panel
A former Clinton Administration adviser and an ex-US Securities Exchange Commission chair will be part of the independent expert panel reviewing Commonwealth Bank's Open Advice Review program.
CBA announced that Promontory Financial Group had been appointed to review the program, after the back accepted conditions imposed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission on its financial planning arms, following the failure of its compensation program for clients.
Promontory Financial Australasia chief executive, Dr Jeff Carmichael, has been appointed to lead the team that will review the program's processes, transparency and report on the outcomes.
Eugene Ludwig, who served as US Comptroller of the Currency, under the Clinton Administration, and Mary Schapiro, the 29th chair of the US Securities Exchange Commission, have also been named as members of Promontory's expert panel.
CBA chief executive, Ian Narev, said the Open Advice Review program would provide customers of Commonwealth Financial Planning and Financial Wisdom, who were affected by the scandal that enveloped the bank's financial planning arms, with "support and comfort".
"Jeff Carmichael, Eugene Ludwig and Mary Schapiro are all recognised as international experts on structure, design and effectiveness of regulatory process," he said.
"Their monitoring and periodic reporting is crucial in delivering a program that will provide comfort and assurance to customer and other that the program is delivering an efficient, fair and consistent outcome."
AUTHOR
Nicholas O'Donoghue
Recommended for you
With AMP advisers moving to Entireti and Insignia being the subject of a private equity bidding war, how can deals be navigated to ensure minimal stress and uncertainty for staff and advisers?
There are seven key mistakes that financial advice businesses need to steer clear of in 2025 to avoid hindering their business growth and profitability, according to Adviser Ratings.
The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would affect financial advisers.
While advisers are increasingly eyeing private markets and alternative investments, two reports have underlined the lack of investor understanding that persists among both advisers and clients.
