Cash back as Glebe shut down

capital gains tax compliance funds management industry financial services reform capital gains investment manager chief executive

24 March 2006
| By Ross Kelly |

Investors in Glebe Asset Management (GAM) will have their funds paid out to them after the ethical investment manager, which put itself up for sale last October, failed to find a suitable buyer.

Chief executive Rodney Dredge said the sale was unsuccessful largely because GAM is an “old fashioned” multi-class institutional manager, for which it was difficult to find a buyer who could provide a comparable investment style in all classes with an ethical overlay.

“So you could argue that it was mission impossible right from the start,” he said.

“But we [tried to sell] for the benefit of our retail unit holders.”

But because a buyer could not be found, Dredge said the only thing that could be done in the best interests of all 2,400 unit holders was to close each fund progressively over a three-month period.

Closure of the funds, which hold around $568 million, began last Tuesday when holding company Glebe Administration Board shut down eight funds — its wholesale small caps funds, and all of its retail funds.

GAM offered a wide range of ethical investment products, including an Australian equities fund, a balanced fund and an international equities fund.

Dredge conceded there would be capital gains tax implications for investors receiving money.

“There will be, but they won’t be huge. One of the benefits of what we’re doing is the way we’re closing the funds down so you get franking credits, and get that balancing effect.

“Our calculations also show that these funds churn sufficiently to keep the capital gains tax relatively low.”

Last October, GAM’s owner, the Anglican Church of Australia, said the planned sale was part of a program of restructuring its investment operations to more closely reflect the needs of its Sydney diocese.

A spokesperson for PricewaterhouseCoopers, which advised GAM on the sale process, said compliance costs brought on by increasing regulation in the funds management industry also contributed to the decision to sell.

“One area of the new financial services landscape which has had an impact on smaller manufacturers has been the introduction of Financial Services Reform and the accompanying increase in compliance costs, particularly when offering retail schemes,” the spokesperson said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 4 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months 1 week ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 6 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 6 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS