Capital protected products targeted
So-called ‘capital protected’ products appear to be in the crosshairs of legal firms looking to represent investors.
With much of the past year having been dominated by litigation relating to failed agricultural managed investment schemes, at least one Sydney-based law firm is now canvassing for retail investors who have incurred losses from capital protected products.
The advertising specifically refers to disclosure relating to the promotion of the capital protected products, a number of which were launched in relation to the global financial crisis.
The emergence of possible legal action around the capital protected products follows on from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission earlier this year reviewing the area and issuing a new regulatory guide.
The new regulatory guide clearly stipulates that “industry participants should not assume that consumers understand the risks involved in complex product offerings”.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
