Can planners help accountants in tough new world?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4947/c494783a34d3b2f1955ac9aec7e6d556444e80de" alt="accountants image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4947/c494783a34d3b2f1955ac9aec7e6d556444e80de" alt="accountants image"
Planners need to take the initiative in reaching out to accountants to handle the new licensing arrangements following the expiration of the accountant's exemption, according to Melbourne-based financial services consultant, John Wiseman.
According to Wiseman, one of the consequences of the new licensing regime is that the real cost of running a compliant self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) is about to be revealed and many trustees and members may be unwilling to pay the higher cost or adhere to more stringent requirements.
He said that in these circumstances he believed planners should be seeking to work with accountants on the new licensing arrangements even in circumstances where the planners did not have a particular expertise in SMSF advice.
"A major reason why more planners have not sought to contact accountants is their speciality and competency is not related to SMSF. I strongly believe all planners irrespective of their expertise should be acting NOW to engage with accountants," Wiseman said.
"Furthermore, I would suggest that there are a very large number of SMSF trustees and members that if they are not aware now — they soon will be that things are going to change — and change significantly," he said.
Wiseman said that for those accountants who have deferred making a decision or are unlikely to continue providing SMSF advice, a meeting with a planner could well be the solution to their difficulty.
He also claimed that the provision of insurance/risk protection would be another area that would be closely scrutinised by authorities and added that "past practices, of a cursory tick to the insurance and protection question in the annual audit will simply not be acceptable".
"A more robust and compliant review will be required in order to insure the Australian Taxation Office and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) are satisfied that meets the requirements of the fund compliance auditor (not the SMSF auditor), the professional indemnity (PI) providers — and hopefully not the legal team required to defend your actions in a court of law or ASIC enquiry," Wiseman said.
"The SMSF insurance requirements will need to be supported by well documented needs analysis, appropriate quotes and recommendations with all details included in a statement of advice (SOA)," he said.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.