Calls for regulatory competition benchmarks
Australia's two corporate regulators should be held accountable for fostering competition in the financial services space by way of tight legislative mandates.
That is the view of the Customer Owned Banking Association (COBA), who used its submission to the Financial System Inquiry (FSI) to argue for mandated benchmarks for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA) to encourage healthy competition in the banking sector.
As such, the association said APRA should be accountable to a non-executive board to oversee decision making, with a senior executive appointed to monitor competition within the sector.
"Without embedding this important principle, any other reforms flowing from the Inquiry will be addressing symptoms rather than the underlying cause," it said.
"The legislative and regulatory framework underpinning the sector does not support competition and is not competitively neutral."
Its' grievances included the bank guarantee to large institutions, which COBA said is anti-competitive, and "a disclosure regime that is failing consumers".
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
