Calls for full CGT on family trusts misguided
Calls for family trusts to pay full capital gains tax (CGT) were off the mark as any real tax loopholes that previously existed were now redundant, a superannuation lawyer said.
Townsends Business and Corporate Lawyers' estate planning and superannuation lawyer, Brian Hor, said scrapping access to the 50 per cent CGT discount by trusts overlooked the fact that family trusts were just "look through" structures from a tax point of view.
"It is the end recipient of a capital gain who may or may not be able to utilise the 50 per cent discount, depending on their own tax circumstances," Hor said.
The calls to scrap the CGT discount comes amid estimates that showed revenue leakage from trusts totalled $1 billion a year.
But Hor argued tax laws have tightened the tax effective use of family trusts, and any undistributed income of family trusts is taxed at the highest marginal rate.
Laws had tackled the splitting of income attributable to personal exertion rather than genuine investment income, the allotment of income to minor children beneficiaries (with penalty tax rates of up to 66 per cent), and the build-up of unpaid present entitlements of corporate beneficiaries.
"People who say that the income tax treatment of family trusts has trouble pass the ‘smell test' need to get their noses checked," Hor said.
Family trusts were mostly used as estate planning structures as asset protection structures, which sheltered small businesses and their personal assets if things went awry.
Hor said any related tax benefits could also be achieved through other structures such as private companies or partnerships.
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
ASIC has cancelled a Sydney AFSL for failing to pay a $64,000 AFCA determination related to inappropriate advice, which then had to be paid by the CSLR.
A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments for investments.
Inefficient data processes and systems mean advisers are spending over half of their time on product implementation and administration at the expense of clients, according to research.
With the regulator announcing its enforcement focus for 2025 last week, law firm Hall & Wilcox examines the areas which have dropped down the list in priority for the regulator.
