Call for restricted use of ‘financial planner’

financial services reform insurance financial planners FPA financial advisers financial advice ATO federal government

The Financial Planning Assocication (FPA) has called on the Federal Government to enshrine the terms “financial planner” and “financial adviser” in the Financial Services Reform Bill, which would give the terms the same status as “accountant”, “stockbroker” and “insurance broker”.

The FPA made the calls in its submission to the Senate Economic References Committee’s hearing into Mass Marketed Tax Effective Schemes.

FPA senior manager of public policy, Con Hristodoulidis, says under the current version of the FSRB, section 923B makes mention of stockbrokers and life and general insurance agents as restricted terms referring to professionals who can receive a licence for the provision of financial advice. But nowhere is a mention of financial planners and financial advisers.

“We say the terms “financial planners” and “financial advisers” should be locked into the legislation,” Hristodoulidis says.

He says that the restricted use of the descriptions of “financial planner” and “financial adviser” under the FSRB would enhance consumer protection. Under the FPA’s proposal, investors would then be certain that they were dealing with financial advisory professionals rather than promoters of a scheme with little or no experience and qualifications in financial planning.

The FPA also took a swipe at the ATO’s recommendations to the Committee that sanctions be imposed against qualified advisers and financial planners who were linked to mass marketed investment schemes.

“Professional advisers can already have sanctions imposed against them,” he says.

The FPA says the ATO has lacked vigilance in dealing with mass marketed investments and had been harsh and unfair in its treatment of investors involved in such schemes. Hristodoulidis says the ATO should have published its determinations submitted to the Senate Committee much sooner.

Further, he says the ATO’s retrospective judgements had eroded investor confidence. The FPA has reacted by calling for an amnesty for investors who had been issued with reassessments by the ATO prior to 1998, as well as a tightening of the monitoring process of prospectuses and a stepping up of an education campaign aimed at consumers.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

5 days 19 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 10 hours ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

4 weeks 1 day ago